IHC Resource Group Bulletin
December, 1999
Volume 2, Number 3
Antigen Retrieval Question
FDA Regs and IHC
NCCLS Guideline for IHC
IHC Resouce Group Bank
Greetings from the IHC Resource Group. We hope you all had a wonderful Holiday and wish everyone a Happy and Healthy 2000!!
Antigen Retrieval Question
This query and response recently appeared on Histonet. We felt it to be
worth repeating here. Many thanks to Catherine Bennett and John Kiernan.
Question:
Do all antigen retrieval procedures do the same thing? In other words, can
an antigen retrieval procedure that is used in one immunohistochemical run be
used successively in another IHC run?
Or is it more a case of trial and error to see which antigen retrieval
will work in any given new IHC procedure? Let's say for this query
that fixation and tissue type are the same, and just the primary antibody is
different.
Answer:
Antigen retrieval works by causing either acid- or base-catalysed hydrolysis of
methylene cross-links between protein molecules, which are introduced by
fixation in formaldehyde, and possibly also by removing calcium ions (citrate
and EDTA are common ingredients of retrieval solutions). Most antigens are
retrieved by heating in either acidified (pH 1) or alkaline (pH 8-10) water,
some by either or neither of these. Less extreme pH levels (e.g. 6) are often
effective and less likely to cause section losses. Something about each antigen
seems to determine which retrieval method is most effective. There are some good
surveys in the literature, with tables showing the effects of different
retrieval methods on many antigens. Here is a very briefly annotated list of 4
such papers:
Taylor,CR; Shi,SR; Cote,RJ (1996a): Antigen retrieval for immunohistochemistry -
Status and need for greater standardization. Appl. Immunohistochem. 4(3),
144-166. Review of antigen retrieval procedures for paraffin sections of
formaldehyde-fixed tissues.
Taylor,CR; Shi,SR; Chen,C; Young,L; Yang,C; Cote,RJ (1996b): Comparative study
of antigen retrieval heating methods: Microwave, microwave and pressure cooker,
autoclave, and steamer. Biotech. Histochem. 71(5, Sep), 263-270.
Pileri,SA; Roncador,G; Ceccarelli,C; Piccioli,M; Briskomatis,A; Sabattini,E;
Ascani,S; Santini,D; Piccaluga,PP; Leone,O; Damiani,S; Ercolessi,C; Sandri,F;
Pieri,F;Leoncini,L; Falini,B (1997): Antigen retrieval techniques in
immunohistochemistry: Comparison of different methods. J. Pathol. 183(1, Sep),
116-123.
Shi,SR; Cote,RJ; Chaiwun,B; Young,LL; Shi,Y; Hawes,D; Chen,TY; Taylor,CR (1998):
Standardization of immunohistochemistry based on antigen retrieval technique for
routine formalin-fixed tissue sections. Appl. Immunohistochem. 6(2, Jun),
89-96.
Most antigens are retrieved in formalin-fixed paraffin
sections treated at pH either 1 or 10. One needed pH 1. The antigen retrieval
solutions used in the above publications are all easy to make up, and there does
not seem much point in buying one commercially, especially if it turns out to be
less than optimal for the antigen you want to detect. Don't use any solution
unless you know its composition.
FDA Regs and IHC
The following are the comments of Peter A. Takes, Ph.D., RAC Director,
Clinical & Regulatory Affairs STEREOTAXIS, Inc. in response to a question
regarding FDA Regs and Immunohistochemistry, reprinted by permission:
The NCCLS IHC Guideline is in the final stages toward 'Approved Guideline'
status. In the interim, the proposed guideline can be obtained from NCCLS
via their web site at http://www.nccls.org
FDA (and hence HCFA) is starting to offer a bit more latitude in the use of IHC
by individual labs. There are basically three types of reagents that you
can acquire based on their labeling: "Research Use Only" [RUO],
"In Vitro Diagnostic Use" [IVD], and "Analyte Specific
Reagents" [ASR]. Most states are getting pretty tight on the use of
RUOs for diagnostic purposes, i.e., Medicare won't reimburse tests that employ
reagents so labeled. California is probably among those leading the way.
ASRs can be used for diagnostic purposes by ANY high complexity lab, but
you have to establish, verify, and validate the tests on your own in order for
them to be acceptable to inspectors and reimbursable. This is where the
laboratory "disclaimer" on final reports comes in to play (See
footnote below).
Manufacturers are restricted, by regulation, from providing a great deal of
application help for ASRs. This is probably how many companies are
labeling their antibodies. IVDs can be used by ANY high complexity lab for
diagnostic purposes, and manufacturers can provide application assistance within
the context of the product's intended use.
What you need to look for is how the reagent is labeled, its intended use, and
what type of other information is provided by the vendor. True,
because of regulatory costs, most diagnostic reagents (IVDs and ASRs) will come
from "big" companies, but that is not universally the case.
Many "small" manufacturers also have IVD and ASR reagents. For
more current information, contact the Joint Council of Immunochemical
Manufacturers [JCIM; formerly Joint Council of Immunohistochemical
Manufacturers] via their web site at http://www.jcim.org
.
JCIM keeps up-to-date on end-user requirements and can better provide the
current perspective. They represent international companies and contract
research organizations as well as many of the smaller companies in the industry,
and are a primary source of regulatory and usage information for end-user labs
as well.
Please note the views expressed are solely observations and interpretations from
my position as a regulatory professional, and are not to be interpreted as and
are not necessarily the views or positions of my employer, Stereotaxis, Inc.
For further, more detailed, information, refer to: Microscopy Today 99-7:8.
September, 1999. Clinical Laboratory News 24(4):10. 1998. and 21(7):43-44. 1995.
Reference:
Peter A. Takes, Ph.D.
Footnote:
The disclaimer on diagnostic reports should resemble the following:
"This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by
(your laboratory). It has not been cleared or approved by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration. The FDA has determined that such clearance or
approval is not necessary. This test is used for clinical purposed.
It should not be regarded as investigational or for research. This
laboratory is regulated under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of
1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high complexity clinical testing.
References: 1. Debbie Jennings-Sienna,
Chair, NSH Legislative Committee 2.
College of American Pathologists
NCCLS Guideline for IHC: More Info
New Guideline Coming Soon From NCCLS (www.nccls.org)
NCCLS is a globally recognized, voluntary consensus standards-developing
organization that enhances the value of medical testing within the healthcare
community through the development and dissemination of standards, guidelines,
and best practices.
The use of immunocytochemical methods, though well-established,
nevertheless continues to challenge the pathologist. Despite the clear
benefits of having another method by which to gain insight into the nature of
disease processes, issues of sensitivity, specificity, and
reproducibility mandate the application of more stringent practices in many
laboratories. To ensure the success of immunocytochemical diagnostic
methods, pre-analytic, analytic and post-analytic factors influencing test
performance may all warrant attention.
The upcoming Approved-Level NCCLS guideline, MM4-A, Quality Assurance for
Immunocytochemistry, addresses the following topics as they relate to the use of
immunocytochemical methods in diagnostic pathology and laboratory medicine:
The importance of laboratory participation in external
quality assurance
activities, such as proficiency testing programs, is a given. In this
document the subcommittee assumes that the laboratory will take part in
such programs, when available. However, it is beyond the scope of this
document to suggest the elements required of such external quality
assurance activities. The document should be useful to pathologists,
histotechnologists, manufacturers of immunocytochemical devices and
reagents, and regulatory personnel.
MM4-A has recently been submitted to the NCCLS Board of Directors for review and
approval. Upon approval by the Board, the document may be published as an
approved guideline by early January 2000.
Reference:
Timothy J. O'Leary, M.D., Ph.D. Marc R. Schlank, M.T. (ASCP), M.S.
FROM THE IHC RESOURCE GROUP BANK
The IHC Resource Group is once again gearing up to help support the efforts of
applicants who have applied for the spring IHC Qualification exam. I have
just received a copy of the May 2000 exam, and there are a few changes from the
last period. The chart below describes what is being required.
Board Of Registry Exam For Immunohistochemistry Qualification, May 2000
| Project # | Antibody(ies) | Tissue |
| 1 | HMB 45 | Melanoma |
| 2 | LCA | Normal tonsil or lymph node |
| 3 | LMW & HMW keratin | Prostate |
| 4 | Chromogranin | Stomach |
| 5 | Estrogen receptor | Breast CA |
| 6 | HPV | Cervix |
| 7 | T-cells & B-cells | Frozen lymph node or tonsil |
| 8 | Factor VIII related antigen | Kidney w cortex & medulla |
| 9 | Muscle specific antigen | Tx both pos and neg for the antibody |
The bank is very low on some tissues, on probe and probe detection systems.
I am earnestly asking for your help. We are out of probe and probe
kits, and as you can see, the applicants will now have to perform HPV on
infected cervix. We have no tissue or reagents presently to support this
part of the exam. If anyone can donate anything, tissue being in the
greatest demand, please let me know. Ask your vendors for samples
for donation to this effort. This might help us
further.
Additionally we are low on prostate, ER pos breast CA, melanoma, and kidney
tissue that has both medulla and cortex, as well as frozen lymph node or frozen
tonsil.
The antibody stores are pretty good. If anyone can contribute a paraffin
block for any of the above tissue, please email me at emacrea@ventanamed.com,
call me at 800-227-2155 ext 2739, or simply mail the blocks to me at the
address below. Thank you for your cooperation!
Ethel R Macrea
4740 N Brookeview Dr
Tucson, AZ 85704
Or
C/o Ventana Medical Systems Inc.
3865 N Business Center Dr
Tucson, AZ 85705
| Patsy Ruegg, Chair Path. Dept. B216 UCHSC 4200 9th Avenue Denver, CO 80262 Fax 303-315-4792 Work 303-315-5310 Home 303-644-4538 patsy.ruegg@uchsc.edu rueggp@earthlink.net |
Ethel Macrea, Bank Manager Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. 3865 N. Business Center Dr. Tucson, AZ 85705 520-887-2155 emacrea@ventanamed.com |